One of the many problems Ridgefield Barbie has is what we euphemistically call "cluelessness."
Watching twitter the other day, this pap popped up:
RT @JaimeLHerrera: Temp. govt jobs arent[sic] “recovery” – 15mm folks still jobless. New plan, new people needed in DC http://bit.ly/9OyNxQ #WA03 #WACOT
So, this sorry effort included a link: http://bit.ly/9OyNxQ. I clicked on the link, eager to see how our empty suit would address this obvious observation; as in, she TALKS about a "new plan," then lies about being "new people" (How many years were you there?) so, I naturally thought she might HAVE a "new plan."
Of course not. Her handlers haven't given her one, and she's got the common sense of a board fence, so SHE won't EVER be able to come up with one on her own.
But I've got to ask: Why would anyone babble about the need for a "new plan" without providing said plan?
Any idiot knows we need new ideas and plans in DC; after all, Herrera even figured that out, and if SHE could get it, a high functioning rock ape could figure it out.
The question is one of background and experience. Herrera's lack of education, her complete lack of private sector experience, her precisely ZERO executive experience and, of course, her complete failure to serve her country in the military.... these things force me to wonder:
Do these gaping holes in her education and experience make it more likely, or less likely that any such plan wouldn't ever come from her?
Of course not.
So here ya go, Babs: You really shouldn't talk about a "new" plan unless you've got one handy.
And you, of course, do not.